Imagine a compliance system costs $12,000 per year. How much is that?
The answer is dependent on what it replaces.
If $12,000 is used to reduce the time spent in repetitive evidence gathering across an intricate technological landscape that could be worth investing. The calculation would be different in the event that a small group of people could collect the same amount of evidence in just one or two minutes per month.
That’s a useful way to approach the search for a Vanta alternative. Identifying the platform with the most features isn’t the only thing to consider. Ask your company about how these features can help you save time and money.
The Break-Even point for automation
Compliance automation isn’t inherently good or bad. The scale of the business can affect its value. Imagine a company that is growing with multiple cloud environments and multiple applications. Manually collecting evidence could be a significant operational burden. Integrations that automatically monitor systems and gather evidence can easily justify the expense.
Consider a startup with 10 employees that is preparing for its initial SOC 2. Imagine a startup with 10 employees who are preparing for their first SOC 2.
It is important to know the difference when you are evaluating Vanta pricing. A modern platform may provide substantial capabilities, but those capabilities deliver financial value only when an organization actually requires the capabilities.
Compare Architecture and not just Brands
Vanta vs Drata is a debate that can easily become a feature-by-feature exercise. Both platforms are built on automation and integrated and therefore, companies seeking this method can benefit from looking at the frameworks they support by their integrations, as well as the service as well as individual quotes and contracts.
You’ll have to decide on the other thing first. Do you want to use a Compliance platform that integrates? Certain businesses want continuous monitoring and automated evidence collection. Certain businesses prefer collecting evidence by themselves.
Vanta Competitors aren’t all following the same model
A number of well-known Vanta rivals compete in a market that has a similar focus on automation. On the market, there are also platforms with a simpler design that focus more on the system’s organization, rather instead of connectivity.
CertAssist is part of the latter category. CertAssist was designed by internal auditors and compliance consultants. It combines framework controls into a single work space and offers editable guidelines on policies as well as evidence. Auditors can examine the evidence through a restricted interface.
It is not able to connect to operational systems nor install infrastructure agents. Customers select and upload the proof they wish to share.
The consideration of access to the System in the Making
The detachment of integrations comes with its limitations: one must be able to manually collect evidence.
The application for compliance does not require integration, and it can be utilized without ongoing connections to the operational environment.
The designs of either are not superior to the other. The important question is which tradeoff makes sense for your company.
CertAssist is aimed at teams of between five and 200 persons. The company publishes its prices rather than needing an initial sales call to determine the price at which to start. The price stated for the launch of CertAssist is $225 a month rather than a regular $375.
Let Complexity Earn Its Place
The needs of a 10-person start-up today might not necessarily match its needs at 100 or 500 employees.
While compliance is simple but a lighter platform might make sense. As the amount of employees, systems frameworks, evidence and requirements increase, the economy could ultimately favor more automation. Let complexity take its place when you purchase compliance technology.
Don’t pay for fifty different integrations because they appear impressive on the chart of comparison. They are worth paying for when doing the tasks they are replacing is more costly than performing them manually.